This series is a culmination of my big take-aways from Morgan Housel’s book The Psychology of Money. This is part 6 of 20.
A few decisions account for almost everything. The trick is surviving long enough to catch one.
Walt Disney made hundreds of cartoons before Snow White. Most of them lost money. Some of them lost a lot of money — by the early 1930s Disney had produced more than 400 shorts and was drowning in debt despite being beloved and famous. Then one film, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, brought in millions and paid for everything. Every flop. Every loan. All of it.
That’s the chapter. A small number of events account for the majority of outcomes — in business, in markets, in careers, in your own portfolio. And it reframes “success” in a way I found genuinely freeing: you can be wrong, even mostly wrong, and still do great, as long as the few times you’re right are big enough.
What the chapter actually says
Housel opens with Heinz Berggruen, an art dealer who fled Nazi Germany and ended up with a collection of Picassos, Klees, and Matisses worth over a billion dollars. How do dealers like that pull it off? Not by having an unteachable eye for which painting will become a masterpiece. They buy huge portfolios — entire estates, hundreds of pieces — knowing most will turn out to be ordinary. A few become legendary, carry the entire collection, and the misses don’t matter.
This is “tails.” In a system where outcomes follow a power law, the extremes — the long tail of the distribution — drive nearly all the results. Disney’s 400 flops were the cost of the one masterpiece. The dealer’s mediocre canvases were the cost of admission to owning a Picasso.
Markets work the same way, and the numbers are startling. Housel points to the Russell 3000, an index of basically the entire U.S. stock market. Over a couple of decades, a large share of those companies were effectively total losers — they lost most of their value and never came back. About 40% were failures. The index’s entire return came from a tiny slice of companies — a few percent — that did spectacularly. Most public stocks are duds. A handful drive everything.
Even Amazon, which we treat as one continuous triumph, is really Prime and AWS carrying a long list of misses. The Fire Phone was a disaster. It didn’t matter — because the tails were big enough to swallow it. Anything huge and famous is, almost by definition, the result of a tail event.
My honest take
This one landed differently than the others, because it quietly attacks how I keep score.
I have a perfectionist streak with money. I want every decision to be right. When I pick a fund, sit on cash too long, or buy something I later regret, I treat it as a small failure — a deduction from some imaginary report card. This chapter says the report card is the wrong tool entirely. The right question isn’t “what’s my batting average?” It’s “when I’m right, am I right big, and when I’m wrong, do I survive?”
That’s a profound shift. A venture capitalist can be wrong about half her companies, see a third limp along, and have one return the whole fund. Her hit rate is terrible. Her results are extraordinary. Judging her by accuracy would tell you nothing useful.
Where I want to push back — or at least add a guardrail — is that “tails win” is dangerously easy to misread as “swing for the fences, accuracy doesn’t matter.” It does matter, in one specific way: you have to stay in the game long enough for a tail to find you. Disney needed to not go bankrupt before Snow White. The index investor needs to hold the whole market, because the few tail companies are unknowable in advance — and if you pick stocks and happen to miss them, you don’t get average returns, you get the 40% of duds.
So the honest synthesis: tails drive returns, but only for people who stay invested and diversified enough to own the tails when they show up. Brilliance is overrated. Showing up is underrated. The combination is everything.
How it applies to me
I’m building Wealthy Habits across three pillars — Money, Mind, Body — and this chapter is basically the operating philosophy for the whole project, especially the blog itself.
Content is a tail business. Most of what I publish will be fine. A few posts will do nothing. And — if I’m patient — one or two will quietly carry the entire thing: the post that ranks, the one that gets shared, the one that turns a stranger into a reader for years. I cannot know in advance which one. So the move isn’t to agonize over making every post perfect. It’s to publish consistently, keep the quality bar honest, and survive long enough financially and emotionally to be standing when a tail hits.
On the money side, it’s a vote for boring, total-market index funds over me trying to be clever. I am not going to identify the next Amazon. Almost nobody does. But I can guarantee I own it by owning everything — and let the handful of winners I can’t name in advance do the heavy lifting.
It also reframes my own savings and side income. Most months are unremarkable. The system isn’t built on the unremarkable months. It’s built on staying solvent and consistent so I’m present for the rare big one — the windfall, the breakout, the opportunity that pays for a decade of patience.
How it applies more broadly
For anyone: stop grading yourself on your hit rate. Your career, your investments, your relationships, your creative work — a few decisions will account for most of the value, and you usually can’t tell which ones in advance. That means two things. First, take enough shots that a tail can find you — show up, apply, publish, invest, reach out. Second, structure your life so a few losses can’t knock you out, because the price of catching a tail is sitting through a lot of ordinary and a fair amount of wrong. Average results, it turns out, can come from a wildly un-average distribution underneath. Plan for the distribution, not the average.
The one habit
This week, pick one area where you’ve been keeping a perfectionist scorecard — investing, your work, a creative project — and consciously trade accuracy for survival plus volume. Concretely: set up one automatic, diversified, can’t-miss-the-tail action (an index auto-invest, a standing weekly publish slot, a recurring outreach) and let go of getting each instance right. That’s the Wealthy Habits move — build a system that stays in the game so the rare big win has somewhere to land.
You don’t need to be right often. You need to be in the room when right finally happens.
Leave a Reply